4.6 Article

Oxidative Stress-Induced Attenuation of Thrombospondin-1 Expression in Primary Rat Astrocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 112, 期 1, 页码 59-70

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.22732

关键词

ASTROCYTES; THROMBOSPONDIN-1; OXIDATIVE STRESS; N-ACETYLCYSTEINE; HYPOXIA; GLIA

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 96-2321-B-006-006-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astrocytes, the major glial population in the central nervous system (CNS), can secrete thrombospondin (TSP)-1 that plays the role in synaptogenesis and axonal sprouting during CNS development and tissue repair. However, little is known about the regulation of TSP-1 expression in astrocytes under oxidative stress condition. Here, a hypoxic mimetic reagent, cobalt chloride (CoCl2), was used to initiate hypoxia-induced oxidative stress in primary rat astrocytes. CoCl2 at the concentration range of 0.1-0.5 mM was found to cause no significant cell death in primary rat astrocytes. However, CoCl2 at 0.2-0.5 mM increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene expression that is known as a hallmark for oxidative damage. We further found that TSP-1 mRNA expression in astrocytes was inhibited dose- and time-dependently by CoCl2. TSP-1 mRNA levels were increased in CoCl2-exposed astrocytes in the presence of the inhibitors (U0126 and PD98059) of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinases (MAPK/ERK), when compared to that detected in the culture only exposed to CoCl2. Moreover, the inhibition in TSP-1 mRNA expression by CoCl2 was blocked by the addition of the potent antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Thus, we conclude that CoCl2 inhibits TSP-1 mRNA expression in astrocytes via a ROS mechanism possibly involving MAPK/ERK. This inhibition may occur after CNS injury and impair the supportive function of astrocytes on neurite growth in the injured CNS tissues. J. Cell. Biochem. 112: 59-70, 2011. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据