4.6 Article

The mismatch repair-mediated cell cycle checkpoint response to fluorodeoxyuridine

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 105, 期 1, 页码 245-254

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.21824

关键词

mismatch repair; 5-Fluouracil; DNA damage; ATR; colorectal cancer

资金

  1. Baylor University Medical Center
  2. Massachusetts General Hospital
  3. NIEHS, NIH
  4. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The loss of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is responsible for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and a subset of sporadic tumors. Acquired resistance or tolerance to some anti-cancer drugs occurs when MMR function is impaired. 5-Fluorouracil (FU), an anti-cancer drug used in the treatment of advanced colorectal and other cancers, and its metabolites are incorporated into RNA and DNA and inhibit thymidylate synthase resulting in depletion of dTTP and incorporation in DNA of uracil. Although the MMR deficiency has been implicated in tolerance to FU, the mechanism of cell killing remains unclear. Here, we examine the cellular response to fluorodeoxyuridine (FdU) and the role of the MMR system. After brief exposure of cells to low closes of FdU, MMR mediates DNA damage signaling during S-phase and triggers arrest: in G2/M in the first cell cycle in a manner requiring MctS alpha, MutL alpha, and DNA replication. Cell cycle arrest is mediated by ATR kinase and results in phosphorylation of Chk1 and SMC1. MutS alpha binds FdU:G mispairs in vitro consistent with its being a DNA damage sensor. Prolonged treatment with FdU results in an irreversible arrest in G2 Chat is independent of MMR status and leads to the accumulation of DNA lesions that are targeted by the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Thus, MMR can act as a direct sensor of FdU-mediated DNA lesions eliciting cell cycle arrest via the ATR/Chk1 pathway. However, at higher levels of damage, other damage surveillance pathways such as BER also play important roles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据