4.5 Article

17β-Estradiol Protects Human Eyelid-Derived Adipose Stem Cells against Cytotoxicity and Increases Transplanted Cell Survival in Spinal Cord injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 326-343

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12191

关键词

cell transplantation; spinal cord injury; hEASCs; 17--estradiol

资金

  1. National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) [2011CB504404]
  2. NSFC [81125014, 81101356, 81071461, J0830833, J1103603]
  3. National Key Scientific Program [2012CB966600]
  4. Zhejiang Province Grants [Y207099, Z2100086]
  5. Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health talents
  6. Foundation of Zhejiang Provincial Key Lab for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
  7. [NCET-08-0487]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stem cell transplantation represents a promising strategy for the repair of spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the low survival rate of the grafted cells is a major obstacle hindering clinical success because of ongoing secondary injury processes, which includes excitotoxicity, inflammation and oxidative stress. Previous studies have shown that 17b-estradiol (E2) protects several cell types against cytotoxicity. Thus, we examined the effects of E2 on the viability of human eyelid adipose-derived stem cells (hEASCs) in vitro with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced cell model and in vivo within a rat SCI model. Our results showed that E2 protected hEASCs against H2O2-induced cell death in vitro, and enhanced the survival of grafted hEASCs in vivo by reducing apoptosis. Additionally, E2 also enhanced the secretion of growth factors by hEASCs, thereby making the local microenvironment more conducive for tissue regeneration. Overall, E2 administration enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of hEASCs transplantation and facilitated motor function recovery after SCI. Hence, E2 administration may be an intervention of choice for enhancing survival of transplanted hEASCs after SCI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据