4.5 Article

MiR-155 inhibits cell migration of human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells (hCMPCs) via targeting of MMP-16

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 2379-2386

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01551.x

关键词

cardiomyocyte progenitor cells; microRNA; cell migration; matrix metalloproteinases

资金

  1. BSIK [6746]
  2. Bekalis price
  3. BioMedical Materials institute [P1.04 SMARTCARE]
  4. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
  5. Nederlandse Hartstichting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Undesired cell migration after targeted cell transplantation potentially limits beneficial effects for cardiac regeneration. MicroRNAs are known to be involved in several cellular processes, including cell migration. Here, we attempt to reduce human cardiomyocyte progenitor cell (hCMPC) migration via increasing microRNA-155 (miR-155) levels, and investigate the underlying mechanism. Human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells (hCMPCs) were transfected with pre-miR-155, anti-miR-155 or control-miR (ctrl-miR), followed by scratch- and transwell-assays. These functional assays displayed that miR-155 over-expression efficiently inhibited cell migration by 38 +/- 3.6% and 59 +/- 3.7% respectively. Conditioned medium from miR-155 transfected cells was collected and zymography analysis showed a significant decrease in MMP-2 and MMP-9 activities. The predicted 3'-UTR of MMP-16, an activator of MMP-2 and -9, was cloned into the pMIR-REPORT vector and luciferase assays were performed. Introduction of miR-155 significantly reduced luciferase activity which could be abolished by cotransfection with anti-miR-155 or target site mutagenesis. By using MMP-16 siRNA to reduce MMP-16 levels or by using an MMP-16 blocking antibody, hCMPC migration could be blocked as well. By directly targeting MMP-16, miR-155 efficiently inhibits cell migration via a reduction in MMP-2 and -9 activities. Our study shows that miR-155 might be used to improve local retention of hCMPCs after intramyocardial delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据