4.5 Review

Osteochondral tissue engineering: scaffolds, stem cells and applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 2247-2270

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01571.x

关键词

osteochondral tissue engineering; bilayered scaffolds; scaffold designs; scaffold fabrication; composites; clinical relevance

资金

  1. Thai Government Science and Technology Scholarship by the Office of the Civil Service Commission (OCSC), Bangkok, Thailand
  2. Emerging Fields Initiative: Bioactive materials, cell and tissue printing: New therapeutic approaches for organ level tissue engineering and regenerative medicine of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteochondral tissue engineering has shown an increasing development to provide suitable strategies for the regeneration of damaged cartilage and underlying subchondral bone tissue. For reasons of the limitation in the capacity of articular cartilage to self-repair, it is essential to develop approaches based on suitable scaffolds made of appropriate engineered biomaterials. The combination of biodegradable polymers and bioactive ceramics in a variety of composite structures is promising in this area, whereby the fabrication methods, associated cells and signalling factors determine the success of the strategies. The objective of this review is to present and discuss approaches being proposed in osteochondral tissue engineering, which are focused on the application of various materials forming bilayered composite scaffolds, including polymers and ceramics, discussing the variety of scaffold designs and fabrication methods being developed. Additionally, cell sources and biological protein incorporation methods are discussed, addressing their interaction with scaffolds and highlighting the potential for creating a new generation of bilayered composite scaffolds that can mimic the native interfacial tissue properties, and are able to adapt to the biological environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据