4.5 Article

Down-regulated miR-331-5p and miR-27a are associated with chemotherapy resistance and relapse in leukaemia

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 2164-2175

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01213.x

关键词

leukaemia; drug resistance; relapse; miR-331-5p; miR-27a; P-glycoprotein

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30672254, 30872784, 30772498]
  2. National High-Tech Program (863) [2008AA02Z106]
  3. National Science and Technology Department and Guangdong Province [2011CB811301, 2009ZX09103-641]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multidrug resistance (MDR) and disease relapse are challenging clinical problems in the treatment of leukaemia. Relapsed disease is frequently refractory to chemotherapy and exhibits multiple drug resistance. Therefore, it is important to identify the mechanism by which cancer cells develop resistance. In this study, we used microRNA (miRNA) microarray and qRT-PCR approaches to investigate the expression of miRNAs in three leukaemia cell lines with different degrees of resistance to doxorubicin (DOX) compared with their parent cell line, K562. The expression of miR-331-5p and miR-27a was inversely correlated with the expression of a drug-resistant factor, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), in leukaemia cell lines with gradually increasing resistance. The development of drug resistance is regulated by the expression of the P-gp. Transfection of the K562 and, a human promyelocytic cell line (HL) HL60 DOX-resistant cells with miR-331-5p and miR-27a, separately or in combination, resulted in the increased sensitivity of cells to DOX, suggesting that correction of altered expression of miRNAs may be used for therapeutic strategies to overcome leukaemia cell resistance. Importantly, miR-331-5p and miR-27a were also expressed at lower levels in a panel of relapse patients compared with primary patients at diagnosis, further illustrating that leukaemia relapse might be a consequence of deregulation of miR-331-5p and miR-27a.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据