4.5 Review

The potential utility of telomere-related markers for cancer diagnosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 1227-1238

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01284.x

关键词

breast cancer; cancer; detection; diagnosis; prostate cancer; telomerase; telomere; telomere dysfunction

资金

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH-09-1-0650]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Methods for telomere length and telomerase detection Telomere length as a potential diagnostic marker in cancer Breast cancer Prostate cancer Other cancer types Telomerase activity as a potential diagnostic marker in cancer Breast cancer Prostate cancer Other cancer types Future directions Conclusions The role telomeres and telomerase play in the initiation and progression of human cancers has been extensively evaluated. Telomeres are nucleoprotein complexes comprising the hexanucleotide DNA repeat sequence, TTAGGG and numerous telomere-associated proteins, including the six member Shelterin complex. The main function of the telomere is to stabilize the ends of the chromosomes. However, through multiple mechanisms, telomeres can become dysfunctional, which may drive genomic instability leading to the development of cancer. The majority of human cancers maintain, or actively lengthen, telomeres through up-regulation of the reverse transcriptase telomerase. Because there are significant differences in telomere length and telomerase activity between malignant and non-malignant tissues, many investigations have assessed the potential to utilize these molecular markers for cancer diagnosis. Here, we critically evaluate whether measurements of telomere lengths and telomerase levels may be clinically utilized as diagnostic markers in solid tumours, with emphasis on breast and prostate cancer as representative examples. Future directions focusing on the direct detection of dysfunctional telomeres are explored. New markers for telomere dysfunction may eventually prove clinically useful.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据