4.5 Article

Evaluation of blood vessel ingrowth in fibrin gel subject to type and concentration of growth factors

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 9A, 页码 2864-2874

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00410.x

关键词

growth factors; VEGF; bFGF; fibrin; tissue engineering; rat

资金

  1. Baxter Healthcare Corporation
  2. Xue-Hong
  3. Hans Georg Geis
  4. University of Erlangen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our aim was to quantitatively assess the angiogenetic effects of VEGF and bFGF immobilized in a fibrin-based drug delivery system in a suitable subcutaneous rat model. After evaluation of a suitable implantation technique (6 rats), four teflon isolation chambers containing fibrin gel matrices were implanted subcutaneously in an upside-down fashion on the back of 30 Lewis rats. The matrices consisted of 500 mu l fibrin gel with two different fibrinogen concentrations (10 mg/ml or 40 mg/ml fibrinogen) and 2 I.U./ml thrombin and contained VEGF and bFGF in five different concentrations (0 to 250 ng/ml each). At 3, 7 and 14 days after implantation, matrices were explanted and subjected to histological and morphometrical analysis. At 1 week, the volume of the fibrin clots was significantly smaller in the 100 and 250 ng/ml VEGF and bFGF groups in comparison to lower concentrated growth factors. At 1 and 2 weeks, the use of growth factors in low concentrations (25 ng/ml VEGF and bFGF) significantly increased the amount of fibrovascular tissue, average fraction of blood vessels and number of blood vessels at the matrix-host interface in comparison to growth factor-free controls. Higher concentrations were neither associated with further increase of tissue formation nor with increased sprouting of blood vessels in this model. This study demonstrates that fibrin gel-immobilized angioinductive growth factors efficiently stimulate generation of fibrovascular tissue and sprouting of blood vessels in a newly developed subcutaneous upside-down isolation chamber model with an optimum between 25 and 100 ng/ml.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据