4.5 Article

Cellular microenvironments reveal defective mechanosensing responses and elevated YAP signaling in LMNA-mutated muscle precursors

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 127, 期 13, 页码 2873-2884

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.144907

关键词

LMNA; Cell microenvironment; Mechanosensitivity; Muscular dystrophy; Yes-associated protein

资金

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  2. Sorbonne Universites-Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Paris
  3. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  4. COST action (Nanonet) [BM1002]
  5. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms underlying the cell response to mechanical forces are crucial for muscle development and functionality. We aim to determine whether mutations of the LMNA gene (which encodes lamin A/C) causing congenital muscular dystrophy impair the ability of muscle precursors to sense tissue stiffness and to respond to mechanical challenge. We found that LMNA-mutated myoblasts embedded in soft matrix did not align along the gel axis, whereas control myoblasts did. LMNA-mutated myoblasts were unable to tune their cytoskeletal tension to the tissue stiffness as attested by inappropriate cell-matrix adhesion sites and cytoskeletal tension in soft versus rigid substrates or after mechanical challenge. Importantly, in soft two-dimensional (2D) and/or static three-dimensional (3D) conditions, LMNA-mutated myoblasts showed enhanced activation of the yes-associated protein (YAP) signaling pathway that was paradoxically reduced after cyclic stretch. siRNA-mediated downregulation of YAP reduced adhesion and actin stress fibers in LMNA myoblasts. This is the first demonstration that human myoblasts with LMNA mutations have mechanosensing defects through a YAP-dependent pathway. In addition, our data emphasize the crucial role of biophysical attributes of cellular microenvironment to the response of mechanosensing pathways in LMNA-mutated myoblasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据