4.5 Article

A crucial role for β2 integrins in podosome formation, dynamics and Toll-like-receptor-signaled disassembly in dendritic cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 127, 期 19, 页码 4213-4224

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.151167

关键词

Podosomes; Dendritic cells; Integrins

资金

  1. MRC Programme [G0701272]
  2. BBSRC [BB/G017123/1]
  3. BBSRC [BB/G017123/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [MC_UP_A500_1020, G1100713, MC_UU_12016/5, G0701272] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G017123/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12016/5, MC_UP_A500_1020, G0701272, G1100713] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dynamic properties of podosomes, their ability to degrade the underlying matrix and their modulation by Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling in dendritic cells (DCs) suggests they have an important role in migration. Integrins are thought to participate in formation and dynamics of podosomes but the multiplicity of integrins in podosomes has made this difficult to assess. We report that murine DCs that lack beta 2 integrins fail to form podosomes. Re-expression of beta 2 integrins restored podosomes but not when the membrane proximal or distal NPxF motifs, or when an intervening triplet of threonine residues were mutated. We show that beta 2 integrins are remarkably long-lived in podosome clusters and form a persistent framework that hosts multiple actin-core-formation events at the same or adjacent sites. When beta 2 integrin amino acid residues 745 or 756 were mutated from Ser to Ala, podosomes became resistant to dissolution mediated through TLR signaling. TLR signaling did not detectably modulate phosphorylation at these sites but mutation of either residue to phospho-mimetic Asp increased beta 2 integrin turnover in podosomes, indicating that phosphorylation at one or both sites establishes permissive conditions for TLR-signaled podosome disassembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据