4.5 Article

Distinct c-Met activation mechanisms induce cell rounding or invasion through pathways involving integrins, RhoA and HIP1

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 127, 期 9, 页码 1938-1952

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.140657

关键词

Cancer; Cell invasion; c-Met; HIP1; Integrin; RhoA

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. ERC Starting Grant
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  4. Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research and Finnish Cancer Organizations
  5. Drug Discovery Graduate School
  6. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  7. UK Medical Research Council
  8. Rosetrees Trust
  9. Medical Research Council [G0501003] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. MRC [G0501003] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many carcinomas have acquired oncogenic mechanisms for activating c-Met, including c-Met overexpression and excessive autocrine or paracrine stimulation with hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). However, the biological outcome of c-Met activation through these distinct modes remains ambiguous. Here, we report that HGF-mediated c-Met stimulation triggers a mesenchymal-type collective cell invasion. By contrast, the overexpression of c-Met promotes cell rounding. Moreover, in a high-throughput siRNA screen that was performed using a library of siRNAs against putative regulators of integrin activity, we identified RhoA and the clathrin-adapter protein HIP1 as crucial c-Met effectors in these morphological changes. Transient RhoA activation was necessary for the HGF-induced invasion, whereas sustained RhoA activity regulated c-Met-induced cell rounding. In addition, c-Met-induced cell rounding correlated with the phosphorylation of filamin A and the downregulation of active cell-surface integrins. By contrast, a HIP1-mediated increase in beta 1-integrin turnover was required for the invasion triggered by HGF. Taken together, our results indicate that c-Met induces distinct cell morphology alterations depending on the stimulus that activates c-Met.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据