4.5 Article

Metabolism and mis-metabolism of the neuropathological signature protein TDP-43

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 127, 期 14, 页码 3024-3038

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.136150

关键词

TDP-43; Protein degradation; Proteolytic cleavage; Chaperone-mediated autophagy; TDP-43-positive aggregate; TDP-43 proteinopathies

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC102-2321-B-001-009]
  2. Taipei Medical University [12310-0149G]
  3. Frontier of Science grant from the National Science Council
  4. Senior Investigator Award from the Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TDP-43 (also known as TARDBP) is a pathological signature protein of neurodegenerative diseases, with TDP-43 proteinopathies including frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD)-TDP and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)-TDP. These TDP-43 proteinopathies are characterized by cytoplasmic insoluble TDP-43-positive aggregates in the diseased cells, the formation of which requires the seeding of TDP-25 fragment generated by caspase cleavage of TDP-43. We have investigated the metabolism and mis-metabolism of TDP-43 in cultured cells and found that endogenous and exogenously overexpressed TDP-43 is degraded not only by the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) and macroautophagy, but also by the chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) mediated through an interaction between Hsc70 (also known as HSPA8) and ubiquitylated TDP-43. Furthermore, proteolytic cleavage of TDP-43 by caspase(s) is a necessary intermediate step for degradation of the majority of the TDP-43 protein, with the TDP-25 and TDP-35 fragments being the main substrates. Finally, we have determined the threshold level of the TDP-25 fragment that is necessary for formation of the cytosolic TDP-43-positive aggregates in cells containing the full-length TDP-43 at an elevated level close to that found in patients with TDP-43 proteinopathies. A comprehensive model of the metabolism and mis-metabolism of TDP-43 in relation to these findings is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据