4.5 Article

Regulation of Src trafficking and activation by the endocytic regulatory proteins MICAL-L1 and EHD1

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 127, 期 8, 页码 1684-1698

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.133892

关键词

Endocytic recycling; Focal adhesion; MICAL-L1; EHD1; Migration; Src; Circular dorsal ruffle

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant from the National Institutes of Health [RO1GM087455]
  2. Nebraska Department of Health
  3. University of Nebraska Medical Centre graduate fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Localization of the non-receptor tyrosine kinase Src to the cell periphery is required for its activation and to mediate focal adhesion turnover, cell spreading and migration. Inactive Src localizes to a perinuclear compartment and the movement of Src to the plasma membrane is mediated by endocytic transport. However, the precise pathways and regulatory proteins that are responsible for SRC transport are incompletely understood. Here, we demonstrate that Src partially colocalizes with the endocytic regulatory protein MICAL-L1 (molecule interacting with CasL-like protein 1) in mammalian cells. Furthermore, MICAL-L1 is required for growth-factor-and integrin-induced Src activation and transport to the cell periphery in HeLa cells and human fibroblasts. Accordingly, MICAL-L1 depletion impairs focal adhesion turnover, cell spreading and cell migration. Interestingly, we find that the MICAL-L1 interaction partner EHD1 (EH domain-containing protein 1) is also required for Src activation and transport. Moreover, the MICAL-L1-mediated recruitment of EHD1 to Src-containing recycling endosomes is required for the release of Src from the perinuclear endocytic recycling compartment in response to growth factor stimulation. Our study sheds new light on the mechanism by which Src is transported to the plasma membrane and activated, and provides a new function for MICAL-L1 and EHD1 in the regulation of intracellular non-receptor tyrosine kinases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据