4.5 Article

Reciprocal cross-regulation between RNF41 and USP8 controls cytokine receptor sorting and processing

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 126, 期 16, 页码 3770-3781

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.131250

关键词

Cathepsin-L cleavage; Nrdp1; RNF41; Type 1 cytokine receptor; USP8; Ectodomain shedding

资金

  1. Belgian government [P6/28, P6/36]
  2. Research Foundation-Flanders [G.0521.12N]
  3. Group-ID Multidisciplinary Research Partnership of Ghent University
  4. FWO-V
  5. IWT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms controlling the steady-state cell surface levels of cytokine receptors, and consequently the cellular response to cytokines, remain poorly understood. The number of surface-exposed receptors is a dynamic balance of de novo synthesis, transport to the plasma membrane, internalization, recycling, degradation and ectodomain shedding. We previously reported that the E3 ubiquitin ligase RING finger protein 41 (RNF41) inhibits basal lysosomal degradation and enhances ectodomain shedding of JAK2-associated cytokine receptors. Ubiquitin-specific protease 8 (USP8), an RNF41-interacting deubiquitylating enzyme (DUB) stabilizes RNF41 and is involved in trafficking of various transmembrane proteins. The present study identifies USP8 as a substrate of RNF41 and reveals that loss of USP8 explains the aforementioned RNF41 effects. RNF41 redistributes and ubiquitylates USP8, and reduces USP8 levels. In addition, USP8 knockdown functionally matches the effects of RNF41 ectopic expression on the model leptin and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) receptors. Moreover, RNF41 indirectly destabilizes the ESCRT-0 complex through suppression of USP8. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that RNF41 controls JAK2-associated cytokine receptor trafficking by acting as a key regulator of USP8 and ESCRT-0 stability. Balanced reciprocal cross-regulation of RNF41 and USP8 thus determines whether receptors are sorted for lysosomal degradation or recycling, this way regulating basal cytokine receptor levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据