4.5 Article

Epithelial organization and cyst lumen expansion require efficient Sec13-Sec31-driven secretion

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 125, 期 3, 页码 673-684

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.091355

关键词

COPII; ER export; Epithelial organization

资金

  1. MRC [G117/553]
  2. BBSRC [E019633]
  3. BBSRC [BB/E019633/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [G0801848, G117/554] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E019633/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C509404/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G117/554, G0801848] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epithelial morphogenesis is directed by interactions with the underlying extracellular matrix. Secretion of collagen and other matrix components requires efficient coat complex II (COPII) vesicle formation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Here, we show that suppression of the outer layer COPII component, Sec 13, in zebrafish embryos results in a disorganized gut epithelium. In human intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2), Sec13 depletion causes defective epithelial polarity and organization on permeable supports. Defects are seen in the ability of cells to adhere to the substrate, form a monolayer and form intercellular junctions. When embedded in a three-dimensional matrix, Sec13-depleted Caco-2 cells form cysts but, unlike controls, are defective in lumen expansion. Incorporation of primary fibroblasts within the three-dimensional culture substantially restores normal morphogenesis. We conclude that efficient COPII-dependent secretion, notably assembly of Sec13-Sec31, is required to drive epithelial morphogenesis in both two- and three-dimensional cultures in vitro, as well as in vivo. Our results provide insight into the role of COPII in epithelial morphogenesis and have implications for the interpretation of epithelial polarity and organization assays in cell culture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据