4.5 Article

TGFB1 disrupts the angiogenic potential of microvascular endothelial cells of the corpus luteum

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 124, 期 14, 页码 2501-2510

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.084558

关键词

TGFB1; Angiogenesis; Luteolysis; Corpus luteum; SMAD; Reproduction; Fertility

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development
  2. Olson Center for Women's Health at the University of Nebraska Medical Center
  3. University of Nebraska Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyclical formation and regression of the ovarian corpus luteum is required for reproduction. During luteal regression, the microvasculature of the corpus luteum is extensively disrupted. Prostaglandin F2., a primary signal for luteal regression, induces the expression of transforming growth factor. 1 (TGFB1) in the corpus luteum. This study determined the actions of TGFB1 on microvascular endothelial cells isolated from the bovine corpus luteum (CLENDO cells). We hypothesized that TGFB1 participates in the disruption of the microvasculature during luteal regression. TGFB1 activated the canonical SMAD signaling pathway in CLENDO cells. TGFB1 (1 ng/ ml) significantly reduced both basal and fetal-calf-serum-stimulated DNA synthesis, without reducing cell viability. TGFB1 also significantly reduced CLENDO cell transwell migration and disrupted the formation of capillary-like structures when CLENDO cells were plated on Matrigel. By contrast, CLENDO cells plated on fibrillar collagen I gels did not form capillary-like structures and TGFB1 induced cell death. Additionally, TGFB1 caused loss of VE-cadherin from cellular junctions and loss of cellcell contacts, and increased the permeability of confluent CLENDO cell monolayers. These studies demonstrate that TGFB1 acts directly on CLENDO cells to limit endothelial cell function and suggest that TGFB1 might act in the disassembly of capillaries observed during luteal regression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据