4.5 Article

Lung-specific loss of the laminin α3 subunit confers resistance to mechanical injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 124, 期 17, 页码 2927-2937

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.080911

关键词

Laminin; Extracellular matrix; Lung; Basement membrane

资金

  1. NIH [HL092963, ES015024, ES013995, HL071643, AR050250, AR054796, AR055503, AI067590]
  2. American Lung Association
  3. Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NUCATS) [UL1 RR025741]
  4. Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laminins are heterotrimeric glycoproteins of the extracellular matrix that are secreted by epithelial cells and which are crucial for the normal structure and function of the basement membrane. We have generated a mouse harboring a conditional knockout of alpha 3 laminin (Lama3fl/fl), one of the main laminin subunits in the lung basement membrane. At 60 days after intratracheal treatment of adult Lama3fl/fl mice with an adenovirus encoding Cre recombinase (Ad-Cre), the protein abundance of alpha 3 laminin in whole lung homogenates was more than 50% lower than that in control-treated mice, suggesting a relatively long half-life for the protein in the lung. Upon exposure to an injurious ventilation strategy (tidal volume of 35 ml per kg of body weight for 2 hours), the mice with a knockdown of the alpha 3 laminin subunit had less severe injury, as shown by lung mechanics, histology, alveolar capillary permeability and survival when compared with Ad-Null-treated mice. Knockdown of the alpha 3 laminin subunit resulted in evidence of lung inflammation. However, this did not account for their resistance to mechanical ventilation. Rather, the loss of alpha 3 laminin was associated with a significant increase in the collagen content of the lungs. We conclude that the loss of alpha 3 laminin in the alveolar epithelium results in an increase in lung collagen, which confers resistance to mechanical injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据