4.5 Article

Plakoglobin regulates cell motility through Rho- and fibronectin-dependent Src signaling

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 123, 期 20, 页码 3576-3586

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.070391

关键词

Armadillo protein; Desmosome; Extracellular matrix; Keratinocyte

资金

  1. American Recovery and Rehabilitation Act [R01AR43380, R01AR041836-17S1, R01CA122151]
  2. NIH [T32 CA070085, F32 AR055444]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously showed that the cell-cell junction protein plakoglobin (PG) not only suppresses motility of keratinocytes in contact with each other, but also, unexpectedly, of single cells. Here we show that PG deficiency results in extracellular matrix (ECM)-dependent disruption of mature focal adhesions and cortical actin organization. Plating PG(-/-) cells onto ECM deposited by PG(+/-) cells partially restored normal cell morphology and inhibited PG(-/-) cell motility. In over 70 adhesion molecules whose expression we previously showed to be altered in PG(-/-) cells, a substantial decrease in fibronectin (FN) in PG(-/-) cells stood out. Re-introduction of PG into PG(-/-) cells restored FN expression, and keratinocyte motility was reversed by plating PG(-/-) cells onto FN. Somewhat surprisingly, based on previously reported roles for PG in regulating gene transcription, PG-null cells exhibited an increase, not a decrease, in FN promoter activity. Instead, PG was required for maintenance of FN mRNA stability. PG(-/-) cells exhibited an increase in activated Src, one of the kinases controlled by FN, a phenotype reversed by plating PG(-/-) cells on ECM deposited by PG(+/-) keratinocytes. PG(-/-) cells also exhibited Src-independent activation of the small GTPases Rac1 and RhoA. Both Src and RhoA inhibition attenuated PG(-/-) keratinocyte motility. We propose a novel role for PG in regulating cell motility through distinct ECM-Src and RhoGTPase-dependent pathways, influenced in part by PG-dependent regulation of FN mRNA stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据