4.5 Article

Facilitated transport and diffusion take distinct spatial routes through the nuclear pore complex

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 123, 期 16, 页码 2773-2780

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.070730

关键词

Nucleocytoplasmic transport; Nuclear pore complex; mRNA export; Protein import; Transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK [BB/E015735/1]
  2. National Institutes of Health, USA [NIH R01 GM051219]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E015735/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/E015735/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transport across the nuclear envelope is regulated by nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). Much is understood about the factors that shuttle and control the movement of cargos through the NPC, but less has been resolved about the translocation process itself. Various models predict how cargos move through the channel; however, direct observation of the process is missing. Therefore, we have developed methods to accurately determine cargo positions within the NPC. Cargos were instantly trapped in transit by high-pressure freezing, optimally preserved by low-temperature fixation and then localized by immunoelectron microscopy. A statistical modelling approach was used to identify cargo distribution. We found import cargos localized surprisingly close to the edge of the channel, whereas mRNA export factors were at the very centre of the NPC. On the other hand, diffusion of GFP was randomly distributed. Thus, we suggest that spatially distinguished pathways exist within the NPC. Deletion of specific FG domains of particular NPC proteins resulted in collapse of the peripheral localization and transport defects specific to a certain karyopherin pathway. This further confirms that constraints on the route of travel are biochemical rather than structural and that the peripheral route of travel is essential for facilitated import.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据