4.5 Article

Chemotactic activation of Dictyostelium AGC-family kinases AKT and PKBR1 requires separate but coordinated functions of PDK1 and TORC2

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 123, 期 6, 页码 983-992

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.064022

关键词

PDK1; Chemotaxis; PI3K/PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3; BAR domains; PH domains; TORC2

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein kinases AKT and PKBR1 of Dictyostelium belong to the AGC protein kinase superfamily. AKT and PKBR1 are phosphorylated at similar sites by phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1) and TORC2 kinases; however, they have different subcellular localizing domains. AKT has a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate [PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3]-regulated PH (pleckstrin homology) domain whereas PKBR1 is myristoylated and persistently membrane localized. Using strains defective for PI3K/PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3-, PDK1- and TORC2-signaling or strains that express phospho-site mutants of AKT and PKBR1, we dissect the different roles of PI3K/PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3, PDK1 and TORC2. We show that activation of AKT and PKBR1 requires PDK1-site phosphorylation, but that phosphorylation by TORC2 is insufficient for AKT or PKBR1 activation. However, PDK1-site phosphorylation is dependent on phosphorylation by TORC2, which suggests that there is regulatory coordination among PDK1, TORC2 and their phospho-site targets. This defines a separate input for signaling in control of chemotaxis and dependency on PDK1 function. We also demonstrate that PDK1 in Dictyostelium functions independently of PI3K/PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3. Finally, we show that AKT and PKBR1 exhibit substrate selectivity and identify two novel lipid-interacting proteins preferentially phosphorylated by AKT. Despite certain similarities, AKT and PKBR1 have distinct regulatory paths that impact activation and effector targeting, with PDK1 serving a central role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据