4.5 Article

Furrow-like invaginations of the yeast plasma membrane correspond to membrane compartment of Can1

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 122, 期 16, 页码 2887-2894

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.051227

关键词

Eisosome; Electron microscopy; MCC; Membrane compartmentalization; Plasma membrane invagination

资金

  1. Agency of the Czech Republic [204/07/0133, 204/08/J024]
  2. Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the CR [KAN200520801]
  3. Agency of the Charles University in Prague [79508]
  4. institutional grant [AVOZ50390703]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG- Priority Program 1108, TA 36/18-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasma membrane of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains stable lateral domains. We have investigated the ultrastructure of one type of domain, the membrane compartment of Can1 (MCC). In two yeast strains (nce102 Delta and pil1 Delta) that are defective in segregation of MCC-specific proteins, we found the plasma membrane to be devoid of the characteristic furrow-like invaginations. These are highly conserved plasma membrane structures reported in early freeze-fracture studies. Comparison of the results obtained by three different approaches - electron microscopy of freeze-etched cells, confocal microscopy of intact cells and computer simulation - shows that the number of invaginations corresponds to the number of MCC patches in the membrane of wild-type cells. In addition, neither MCC patches nor the furrow-like invaginations colocalized with the cortical ER. In mutants exhibiting elongated MCC patches, there are elongated invaginations of the appropriate size and frequency. Using various approaches of immunoelectron microscopy, the MCC protein Sur7, as well as the eisosome marker Pil1, have been detected at these invaginations. Thus, we identify the MCC patch, which is a lateral membrane domain of specific composition and function, with a specific structure in the yeast plasma membrane - the furrow-like invagination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据