4.5 Article

Interaction between PAR-3 and the aPKC-PAR-6 complex is indispensable for apical domain development of epithelial cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 122, 期 10, 页码 1595-1606

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.043174

关键词

PAR; aPKC; Epithelial cells; Polarity; Apical domain

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Young Scientists Start-up [19870019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolutionarily conserved polarity proteins PAR-3, atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) and PAR-6 critically regulate the apical membrane development required for epithelial organ development. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying their roles remain to be clarified. We demonstrate that PAR-3 knockdown in MDCK cells retards apical protein delivery to the plasma membrane, and eventually leads to mislocalized apical domain formation at intercellular regions in both two-dimensional and three-dimensional culture systems. The defects in PAR-3 knockdown cells are efficiently rescued by wild-type PAR-3, but not by a point mutant (S827/829A) that lacks the ability to interact with aPKC, indicating that formation of the PAR-3-aPKC-PAR-6 complex is essential for apical membrane development. This is in sharp contrast with tight junction maturation, which does not necessarily depend on the aPKC-PAR-3 interaction, and indicates that the two fundamental processes essential for epithelial polarity are differentially regulated by these polarity proteins. Importantly, highly depolarized cells accumulate aPKC and PAR-6, but not PAR-3, on apical protein-containing vacuoles, which become targeted to PAR-3-positive primordial cell-cell contact sites during the initial stage of the repolarization process. Therefore, formation of the PAR-3-aPKC-PAR-6 complex might be required for targeting of not only the aPKC-PAR-6 complex but also of apical protein carrier vesicles to primordial junction structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据