4.5 Article

BLM helicase stimulates the ATPase and chromatin-remodeling activities of RAD54

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 122, 期 17, 页码 3093-3103

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.051813

关键词

Homologous recombination; Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching; RAD51; RecQ helicase

资金

  1. National Institute of Immunology core funds
  2. Department of Biotechnology, India [BT/PR9598/Med/30/33/2007]
  3. Department of Science and Technology, India [SR/SO/HS-24/2005]
  4. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research [37(1348)/08/EMR-II]
  5. National Institutes of Health, USA [1 R01 TW007302-01A1]
  6. FOGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER [R01TW007302] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutation of BLM helicase results in the autosomal recessive disorder Bloom syndrome (BS). Patients with BS exhibit hyper-recombination and are prone to almost all forms of cancer. BLM can exhibit its anti-recombinogenic function either by dissolution of double Holliday junctions or by disruption of RAD51 nucleofilaments. We have now found that BLM can interact with the pro-recombinogenic protein RAD54 through an internal ten-residue polypeptide stretch in the N-terminal region of the helicase. The N-terminal region of BLM prevented the formation of RAD51-RAD54 complex, both in vitro and in vivo. Using the fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) technique, we found that RAD54 and BLM rapidly and concurrently, yet transiently, bound to the chromatinized foci. Presence of BLM enhanced the mobility of both soluble and chromatinized RAD51 but not RAD54. The BLM-RAD54 interaction could occur even in absence of functional RAD51. The N-terminal 1-212 amino acids of BLM or an ATPase-dead mutant of the full-length helicase enhanced the ATPase and chromatin-remodeling activities of RAD54. These results indicate that apart from its dominant function as an anti-recombinogenic protein, BLM also has a transient pro-recombinogenic function by enhancing the activity of RAD54.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据