4.5 Article

ATF6α induces XBP1-independent expansion of the endoplasmic reticulum

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 122, 期 10, 页码 1626-1636

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.045625

关键词

Endoplasmic reticulum biogenesis; Unfolded protein response; ATF6 alpha; XBP1; Lipid biosynthesis

资金

  1. NIH [GM61970, T32AI007508, GM45737, DK042394, HL052173]
  2. Cancer Center (CORE) [CA21765]
  3. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A link exists between endoplasmic reticulum (ER) biogenesis and the unfolded protein response (UPR), a complex set of signaling mechanisms triggered by increased demands on the protein folding capacity of the ER. The UPR transcriptional activator X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) regulates the expression of proteins that function throughout the secretory pathway and is necessary for development of an expansive ER network. We previously demonstrated that overexpression of XBP1(S), the active form of XBP1 generated by UPR-mediated splicing of Xbp1 mRNA, augments the activity of the cytidine diphosphocholine (CDP-choline) pathway for biosynthesis of phosphatidylcholine (PtdCho) and induces ER biogenesis. Another UPR transcriptional activator, activating transcription factor 6 alpha (ATF6 alpha), primarily regulates expression of ER resident proteins involved in the maturation and degradation of ER client proteins. Here, we demonstrate that enforced expression of a constitutively active form of ATF6 alpha drives ER expansion and can do so in the absence of XBP1(S). Overexpression of active ATF6 alpha induces PtdCho biosynthesis and modulates the CDP-choline pathway differently than does enforced expression of XBP1(S). These data indicate that ATF6 alpha and XBP1(S) have the ability to regulate lipid biosynthesis and ER expansion by mechanisms that are at least partially distinct. These studies reveal further complexity in the potential relationships between UPR pathways, lipid production and ER biogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据