4.5 Article

Integrin signal masks growth-promotion activity of HB-EGF in monolayer cell cultures

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 122, 期 23, 页码 4277-4286

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.054551

关键词

EGFR; HB-EGF; Integrin; 3D culture

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology [14032202, 16207014]
  2. Charitable Trust Osaka Cancer Research-Fund
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16207014, 14032202] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extracellular environment and tissue architecture contribute to proper cell function and growth control. Cells growing in monolayers on standard polystyrene tissue culture plates differ in their shape, growth rate and response to external stimuli, compared with cells growing in vivo. Here, we showed that the EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) ligand heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) strongly stimulated cell growth in nude mice, but not in cells cultured in vitro. We explored the effects of HB-EGF on cell growth under various cell culture conditions and found that growth promotion by HB-EGF was needed in three-dimensional (3D) or two-dimensional (2D) culture systems in which cell-matrix adhesion was reduced. Under such conditions, cell growth was extremely suppressed in the absence of HB-EGF, but markedly potentiated in the presence of HB-EGF. When the integrin signal was reduced using antibodies or knockout of either integrin beta 1 or focal adhesion kinase (FAK), cells showed HB-EGF-dependent growth. We also showed that EGF, transforming growth factor alpha (TGF alpha) or ligands of other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) stimulated cell growth in 3D culture, but not in tissue culture plates. These results indicate that the integrin signal was sufficient to support cell growth in 2D tissue culture plates without addition of the growth factor, whereas stimulation by growth factors was clearly demonstrated in culture systems in which integrin signals were attenuated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据