4.5 Article

Differential trafficking of Kif5c on tyrosinated and detyrosinated microtubules in live cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 121, 期 7, 页码 1085-1095

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.026492

关键词

kinesin-1; microtubules; detyrosinated microtubules; trafficking

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D524875/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Cancer Research UK Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline
  5. BBSRC [BB/D524875/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kinesin-1 is a molecular transporter that trafficks along microtubules. There is some evidence that kinesin-1 targets specific cellular sites, but it is unclear how this spatial regulation is achieved. To investigate this process, we used a combination of in vivo imaging of kinesin heavy-chain Kif5c ( an isoform of kinesin-1) fused to GFP, in vitro analyses and mathematical modelling. GFP-Kif5c fluorescent puncta localised to a subset of microtubules in live cells. These puncta moved at speeds of up to 1 mu m second(-1) and exchanged into cortically labelled clusters at microtubule ends. This behaviour depended on the presence of a functional motor domain, because a rigor-mutant GFP-Kif5c bound to microtubules but did not move along them. Further analysis indicated that the microtubule subset decorated by GFP-Kif5c was highly stable and primarily composed of detyrosinated tubulin. In vitro motility assays showed that the motor domain of Kif5c moved detyrosinated microtubules at significantly lower velocities than tyrosinated ( unmodified) microtubules. Mathematical modelling predicted that a small increase in detyrosination would bias kinesin-1 occupancy towards detyrosinated microtubules. These data suggest that kinesin-1 preferentially binds to and trafficks on detyrosinated microtubules in vivo, providing a potential basis for the spatial targeting of kinesin-1-based cargo transport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据