4.7 Article

Structures of the fungal dynamin-related protein Vps1 reveal a unique, open helical architecture

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 217, 期 10, 页码 3608-3624

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201712021

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences from the National Institutes of Health [P41 GM103403]
  2. National Institutes of Health Office of Research Infrastructure Programs High-End Instrumentation grant [S10 RR029205]
  3. Department of Energy Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [W-31-109-Eng-38]
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. Medical Research Council
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [EM14856-13]
  8. National Institutes of Health [GM120102, GM082251]
  9. UK Wellcome Trust [206422/Z/17/Z]
  10. BBSRC [BB/S003339/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamin-related proteins (DRPs) are large multidomain GTPases required for diverse membrane-remodeling events. DRPs self-assemble into helical structures, but how these structures are tailored to their cellular targets remains unclear. We demonstrate that the fungal DRP Vps1 primarily localizes to and functions at the endosomal compartment. We present crystal structures of a Vps1 GTPase-bundle signaling element (BSE) fusion in different nucleotide states to capture GTP hydrolysis intermediates and concomitant conformational changes. Using cryoEM, we determined the structure of full-length GMP PCP-bound Vps1. The Vps1 helix is more open and flexible than that of dynamin. This is due to further opening of the BSEs away from the GTPase domains. A novel interface between adjacent GTPase domains forms in Vps1 instead of the contacts between the BSE and adjacent stalks and GTPase domains as seen in dynamin. Disruption of this interface abolishes Vps1 function in vivo. Hence, Vps1 exhibits a unique helical architecture, highlighting structural flexibilities of DRP self-assembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据