4.3 Article

Significance of the riboflavin film in corneal collagen crosslinking

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 114-120

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.044

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of the preocular riboflavin film in ultraviolet-A (UVA) absorption in corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL). SETTING: Eye Laser Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany. METHODS: The absorption of UVA light was measured in human donor and porcine postmortem corneas with and without riboflavin film using 3 solutions: standard dextran riboflavin, methylcellulose riboflavin, and hypoosmolar riboflavin sodium chloride without dextran. The breakup time of the solutions and their absorbance were also determined. RESULTS: After 30-minute instillation of riboflavin solution, the corneal absorption coefficient of the combined stroma riboflavin film system was 56.36 cm(-1) in human corneas and 51.46 cm(-1) in porcine corneas using dextran riboflavin; 69.87 cm(-1) and 53.86 cm(-1), respectively, using methylcellulose riboflavin; and 48.19 cm(-1) and 42.68 cm(-1), respectively, using hypoosmolar riboflavin. For the stroma alone without riboflavin film, the absorption coefficient was reduced to 36.95 cm(-1) in human corneas and 28.91 cm(-1) in porcine corneas using dextran riboflavin; 38.26 cm(-1) and 32.49 cm(-1), respectively, using methylcellulose riboflavin; and 38.88 cm(-1) and 28.42 cm(-1), respectively, using hypoosmolar riboflavin solution. The breakup time was 22 minutes for the dextran riboflavin film, 32 minutes for methylcellulose, and 90 seconds for the hypoosnnolar solution. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that the cornea including the riboflavin film can be considered a composite 2-compartment system and that the riboflavin film is an integral part of the CXL procedure and important in achieving the correct stromal and endothelial UVA irradiance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据