4.8 Article

Catalytic partial oxidation of methane on platinum investigated by spatial reactor profiles, spatially resolved spectroscopy, and microkinetic modeling

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 1-16

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2012.08.022

关键词

Catalytic partial oxidation; Methane; Synthesis gas; Platinum; Microkinetic modeling; Carbon formation; Raman spectroscopy; Electron microscopy

资金

  1. German Research Foundation
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the framework of the Excellence Cluster Unifying Concepts in Catalysis
  3. Alexander von Humboldt foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatially resolved profile measurements, Raman spectroscopy, electron microscopy, and microkinetic modeling have been used to study the catalytic partial oxidation of methane on Pt. The measured species profiles through Pt coated foam catalysts exhibit a two-zone structure: an abrupt change in reaction rates separates the fast exothermic oxidation chemistry at the entrance of the reactor from the slow endothermic reforming chemistry. Spatially resolved Raman spectroscopy and electron microscopy confirm that the position of the mechanistic change could be correlated with Pt transportation and formation of carbonaceous deposits blocking the majority of active Pt sites in the reforming zone. The species profiles were simulated using a pseudo-2D heterogeneous model, which includes heat and mass transport limitations, and two state-of-the-art chemical kinetic mechanisms. Although both mechanisms are in quantitative agreement with the oxygen profiles, the two mechanisms differ substantially in their predictions of the branching ratio between partial and complete oxidation, as well as surface site coverages. The experimentally observed change in reaction rates is attributed to carbon formation, which the mechanisms are unable to reproduce, since they do not include carbon-carbon coupling reactions. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据