4.8 Article

Opportunities for selective catalysis within discrete portions of zeolites: The case for SSZ-57LP

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 308, 期 -, 页码 213-225

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2013.07.028

关键词

Zeolite catalysis; SSZ-57; Constraint Index; n-Hexane hydroisomerization; Diethylbenzene isomerization and disproportionation; Aluminum re-insertion in zeolites; Borosilicates

资金

  1. Chevron Energy Technology Co.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe a new zeolite catalyst where we develop only a portion of the structure for strong acid sites. This is achieved using zeolite SSZ-57 in boron lattice substitution (weak acid sites) and then replacing the boron sites in the large pore segments of this novel zeolite, while the intermediate pores (with MEL topology) remain unchanged. We can achieve the creation of such a novel catalyst system due to the inherent structure of SSZ-57 (repeat domains of MEL topology, periodically interrupted by a short segment of large pores) because the re-insertion of aluminum for boron requires that the pores be large to effect substitution. In this work, we describe the preparation and characterization of the novel material designated as SSZ-57LP. We use three model compound reactions to demonstrate the unique behavior for this novel large pore (but short path) zeolite and contrast it with intermediate pore zeolite Al-ZSM-11 (MEL topology) and the Al-SSZ-57 where the strong acid sites are in both intermediate and large pore regions (from direct zeolite synthesis with aluminum in the gel). The reactions studied are the Constraint Index probing reactant selectivity for cracking n-hexane and 3-methylpentane, the hydroisomerization of n-hexane where the formation of dimethylbutanes is examined for large pore space within a zeolite, and then finally, the isomerization and disproportionation of 1,3-diethylbenzene, again as a probe for large enough transition state selectivity within a given zeolite. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据