4.8 Article

Nickel-doped Mn/TiO2 as an efficient catalyst for the low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3: Catalytic evaluation and characterizations

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 288, 期 -, 页码 74-83

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2012.01.003

关键词

Low-temperature NH3-SCR; Manganese dioxide (Mn4+); Nickel oxide (NiO); XPS; Hydrothermal stability; Nitric oxide

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-0828226]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0828226] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mn/TiO2 and a series of Mn-Ni/TiO2 catalysts were prepared by adopting incipient wetness technique and investigated for the low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3 in the presence of excess oxygen. Our XPS results illustrated that the MnO2 is the dominant phase with respect to the Mn2O3 phase (Mn4+/Mn3+ = 22.31, 96%), thus leading to a large number of Mn4+ species (Mn4+/Ti) over the titania support for the Mn-Ni(0.4)/TiO2 catalyst. It is remarkable to note that the SCR performance of all the nickel-doped Mn/TiO2 catalysts is accurately associated with the surface Mn4+ concentrations. The co-doping of nickel into the Mn/TiO2 with 0.4 Ni/Mn atomic ratio promotes the formation of surface MnO2 phase and inhibits the formation of surface Mn2O3 sites. Our TPR results revealed that the addition of nickel oxide to titania-supported manganese results in the stabilization of the former in the form of MnO2 rather than Mn2O3. Our TPR data results are in agreement with XPS results that the absence of the high-temperature (736 K) peak indicates that the dominant phase in the Mn-Ni/TiO2 catalysts is MnO2. The low-temperature reduction peak is shifted to much lower temperatures in nickel-doped Mn/TiO2 catalysts. This increase in reducibility and the extremely dominant MnO2 phase seem to be the reason for the high SCR activity of the Mn-Ni/TiO2 catalysts. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据