4.8 Article

Identifying the active redox oxygen sites in a mixed Cu and Ce oxide catalyst by in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy and anaerobic reactions with CO in concentrated H2

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 294, 期 -, 页码 69-78

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2012.07.005

关键词

Mixed copper cerium oxide; CO-PROX; Active redox oxygen; XAS; Anaerobic titration; UV-Vis

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. Department of Energy
  3. NSF (CBET Career Award) [0644707]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0644707] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The active redox oxygen site of a mixed copper cerium oxide catalyst (Cu0.07Ce0.93O2) and the active copper species for CO preferential oxidation in rich H-2 were investigated by in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) at Cu K-edge during anaerobic reaction along with X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), ultraviolet-visible-near infrared (UV-Vis-NIR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. During anaerobic reaction, the absorption edge energy of in situ X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES) spectra shifts to lower energy and the white-line intensity decreases, suggesting the reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) via the removal of surface lattice oxygen to oxidize CO. In addition, the first shell Cu-O peak intensity decrease of a series of Fourier transformed extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectra during anaerobic reaction indicates the loss of copper's first oxygen neighbor to oxidize CO. These provided for the first time the experimental evidence that the active/labile oxygen in copper cerium oxide catalysts is the first oxygen neighbor of Cu(II) species, which is further supported by UV-Vis studies on the reduction of the optical absorption edge energy of copper in the catalyst. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据