4.8 Article

The catalysts of three-dimensionally ordered macroporous Ce1-xZrxO2-supported gold nanoparticles for soot combustion: The metal-support interaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 287, 期 -, 页码 13-29

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2011.11.006

关键词

Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous materials; Gold; Ce1-xZrxO2; Soot combustion; Heterogeneous catalysis; Interaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20833011, 21177160, 21173270, 20803093]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China [NCET-10-0811]
  3. 863 program of China [2009AA06Z313]
  4. CNPC [2011D-4604-0101]
  5. Innovation Foundation [2010D-5006-0402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) Ce1-xZrxO2-supported gold nanoparticle catalysts were successfully synthesized by the gas bubbling-assisted membrane reduction (GBMR) method. Au nanoparticles with similar sizes are well dispersed and supported on the inner walls of uniform macropores. The active oxygen species (O-2(-), O-) over 3DOM Au/Cel-xZrxO2 catalysts are derived from the two approaches: one is direct activation of oxygen on the surface of gold nanoparticles and the other is derived from strong metal-support interaction in which Ce-based supports serve as a reservoir for oxygen in the oxidation reaction. 3DOM Au/Ce1-xZr5O2 catalysts exhibited good catalytic performance for soot combustion, which is strongly related to the role of supports including the structures, the Ce/Zr ratios and the active oxygen supply pathways. The reaction pathways of soot combustion can be classified by two regions. At the low temperature, the soot particles are direct oxidized by active oxygen species migrated from the surface of supported Au catalysts. At the relatively high temperature, the catalytic activity for soot combustion is strongly related to intermediate reactant of NO2 derived from NO oxidation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据