4.8 Article

Methanol oxidation on VSiBEA zeolites: Influence of V content on the catalytic properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 281, 期 1, 页码 169-176

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2011.04.013

关键词

BEA; Zeolite; Vanadium; Methanol; Oxidation

资金

  1. CNRS (France)
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [118/COS/2007/03]
  3. COST [D36/0006/06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study deals with the influence of V content on the catalytic properties of V(x)SiBEA zeolites in the oxidation of methanol. The samples are prepared following a postsynthesis method reported earlier (S. Dzwigaj, M.J. Peltre, P. Massiani, A. Davidson, M. Che, T. Sen, S. Sivasanker, Chem. Commun. (1998) 87). The incorporation of isolated mononuclear V(V) into the framework of SiBEA is evidenced by XRD, FTIR, diffuse reflectance UV-vis and NMR. It is found that, for low V content, V(V) ions are in pseudo-tetrahedral coordination only, either in nonhydroxylated (SiO)(3)V=O or hydroxylated (SiO)(2)(OH)V=O species in framework position. For higher V content, additional species appear in extraframework position with vanadium in octahedral coordination. FUR investigations of pyridine adsorption show that strong Bronsted and Lewis acidic centres are present in SiBEA leading to dimethyl ether only, in methanol oxidation. Upon incorporation of vanadium into the BEA framework, Lewis acidic (V5+) and basic (O2-) centres are generated with simultaneous appearance of partial oxidation products mainly, whose total concentration increases with vanadium content. These results suggest that those centres are responsible for the oxidation activity of V(x)SiBEA zeolites. The selectivity toward formaldehyde increases with the amount of vanadium present as pseudo-tetrahedral hydroxylated (SiO)(2)(HO)V=O species. This selectivity is suggested to be related to the moderate nucleophilicity of the basic vanadyl oxygen (V=O) of (SiO)(2)(HO)V=O species. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据