4.8 Article

Conversion of furfural and 2-methylpentanal on Pd/SiO2 and Pd-Cu/SiO2 catalysts

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 280, 期 1, 页码 17-27

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2011.02.006

关键词

Pd catalyst; Bimetallic PdCu catalyst; Hydrogenation; Decarbonylation; Furfural; 2-Methylpentanal

资金

  1. National Science Foundation EPSCOR [0814361]
  2. Oklahoma Bioenergy Center
  3. Department of Energy [DE-FG36GO88064]
  4. EPSCoR
  5. Office Of The Director [0814361] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conversion of furfural (FAL) and 2-methylpentanal (MPAL) under hydrogen has been studied over silica-supported monometallic Pd and bimetallic Pd-Cu catalysts. At low space times, the conversion of MPAL yields primarily pentane (decarbonylation), but at higher space times, di-methylpentyl ether (etherification) becomes the main product. Upon addition of Cu, both the overall activity and the decarbonylation selectivity decrease while the selectivity to hydrogenation and etherification increases. In contrast to MPAL, the conversion of FAL shows no etherification products at any space time in the temperature range 210-250 degrees C but only produces furan via decarbonylation. It is proposed that the presence of the aromatic ring in the furfural molecule has a marked effect in inhibiting the formation of the alkoxide surface intermediate, which is required in the etherification reaction. Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations of furfural and 2-methyl pentanal have been conducted to gain a better understanding of the differences in the molecule-surface interactions between the aldehydes and the Pd and Pd-Cu surfaces. The reaction mechanisms and the resulting selectivity towards the possible reaction paths (hydrogenation/etherification/decarbonylation) are discussed in terms of the relative stability of the eta(2)-(C,O) and acyl surface species occurring on the different metal surfaces. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据