4.8 Article

CO activation pathways and the mechanism of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 272, 期 2, 页码 287-297

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.04.012

关键词

Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; Iron catalysts; Cobalt catalysts; CO hydrogenation; CO dissociation; Density functional theory

资金

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FC26-03NT41964]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of Spain
  3. DOE-NETL [DE-FC26-03NT41966]
  4. DOE-BES
  5. US Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357, DEAC05-00OR22725, DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research at PNNL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unresolved mechanistic details of monomer formation in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) and of its oxygen rejection routes are addressed here by combining kinetic and theoretical analyses of elementary steps on representative Fe and Co surfaces saturated with chemisorbed CO. These studies provide experimental and theoretical evidence for hydrogen-assisted CO activation as the predominant kinetically-relevant step on Fe and Co catalysts at conditions typical of FTS practice. H-2 and CO kinetic effects on FTS rates and oxygen rejection selectivity (as H2O or CO2) and density functional theory estimates of activation barriers and binding energies are consistent with H-assisted CO dissociation, but not with the previously accepted kinetic relevance of direct CO dissociation and chemisorbed carbon hydrogenation elementary steps. H-assisted CO dissociation removes O-atoms as H2O, while direct dissociation forms chemisorbed oxygen atoms that desorb as CO2. Direct CO dissociation routes are minor contributors to monomer formation on Fe and may become favored at high temperatures on alkali-promoted catalysts, but not on Co catalysts, which remove oxygen predominantly as H2O because of the preponderance of H-assisted CO dissociation routes. The merging of experiment and theory led to the clarification of persistent mechanistic issues previously unresolved by separate experimental and theoretical inquiries. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据