4.8 Article

Combining high-throughput experimentation, advanced data modeling and fundamental knowledge to develop catalysts for the epoxidation of large olefins and fatty esters

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 258, 期 1, 页码 25-34

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.05.033

关键词

epoxidation; Ti-MCM-41; Ti-ITQ-2; silylating agents; high-throughput; molecular modeling; test reaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By combining catalyst characterization, molecular descriptors, and high-throughput techniques. two structured titanosilicates, Ti-MCM-41 and Ti-ITQ-2, were successfully optimized for the epoxidation of large olefins and methyl oleate. This new methodology for material science and catalysis can help to identify and partially quantify the roles of the variables involved in catalyst synthesis based on a small number of experiments. Associations among the chemical properties of the silicate used as support (ITQ-2. MCM-41), the dispersion and number of Ti sites grafted onto the surface, the presence of surface modifiers (silylating agents), the nature of the selected alkenes, and the catalytic activity and selectivity are established. We show that the use of surface modifiers increases the activity and selectivity of the catalysts, but that the effectiveness of each silylating agent depends on the surface characteristics of the support. Correlation of the results from the epoxidation of a test molecule, 4-decene with those for the industrially relevant methyl oleate show that the reactivity of the substrate also is significantly influenced by the surface properties of the support. We find that Ti-ITQ-2 modified with SiMe2Bu (dimethylbutylsilane), instead of the more commonly used Ti-MCA-41-SiMe3 system (with trimethylsilane as a silylating agent), represents the best option for carrying out the epoxidation of this fatty ester, leading to a highly active and selective catalyst. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据