4.8 Article

The chemistry of the NO/NO2-NH3 fast SCR reaction over Fe-ZSM5 investigated by transient reaction analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 256, 期 2, 页码 312-322

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.03.027

关键词

urea SCR; fast SCR; ammonium nitrate; zeolite catalysts; diesel exhaust after treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a systematic study of the chemical steps in the NO/NO2-NH3 fast SCR reaction 2NH(3) + NO + NO2 -> 2N(2) + 3H(2)O over a commercial Fe-ZSM5 catalyst. The study is based on transient reaction experiments at realistic conditions for removal of NOx from mobile diesel exhausts. Its goal is to assess and critically evaluate the current ideas on the SCR mechanism, and also to establish to what extent the mechanistic pathways demonstrated for V-based catalysts also apply to Fe-promoted zeolites. Results show that the fast SCR reaction proceeds at low temperature via a global sequence involving NH4NO3 or related surface species as intermediates, 2NO(2) + 2NH(3) -> N-2 + NH4NO3 + H2O, NO + NH4NO3 -> NO2 + N-2 + 2H(2)O. Such a sequential scheme is the same as that proposed previously for the fast SCR chemistry over V-based catalysts and other zeolite catalysts and thus is considered a general mechanism. It explains all of the available observations for stoichiometry (e.g., optimum NO/NO2 unit molar ratio), selectivity (e.g., N2O from NH4NO3 decomposition), and kinetics (e.g., rate of fast SCR =rate of nitrate reduction by NO). We further show that the redox reaction between NO and nitrates is the rate-controlling step and is inhibited by ammonia. Remarkably, the same strongly enhanced deNO(x) activity observed in the fast SCR reaction also was observed in the absence of gaseous NO2 but in the presence of surface nitrates. We accordingly propose a general summary of the fast SCR chemistry over V-based and zeolite catalysts that emphasizes the key role of surface nitrates. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据