4.4 Review

A Novel Pharmacologic Inhibitor of the NLRP3 Inflammasome Limits Myocardial Injury After Ischemia-Reperfusion in the Mouse

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 63, 期 4, 页码 316-322

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000053

关键词

caspase-1; acute myocardial infarction; inflammasome

资金

  1. American Heart Association
  2. VCU School Medicine Summer Research Award
  3. NIH R01 grant [AG041161]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the heart during acute myocardial infarction amplifies the inflammatory response and mediates further damage. Glyburide has NLRP3 inhibitory activity in vitro but requires very high doses in vivo, associated with hypoglycemia. The aim of this study was to measure the effects on the NLRP3 inflammasome of 16673-34-0, an intermediate substrate free of the cyclohexylurea moiety, involved in insulin release. Methods and Results: We synthesized 16673-34-0 (5-chloro-2-methoxy-N-[2-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)ethyl]benzamide) that displayed no effect on glucose metabolism. HL-1 cardiomyocytes were treated with lipopolysaccharide and ATP to induce the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, measured as increased caspase-1 activity and cell death, and 16673-34-0 prevented such effects. 16673-34-0 was well tolerated with no effects on the glucose levels in vivo. Treatment with 16673-34-0 in a model of acute myocardial infarction because of ischemia and reperfusion significantly inhibited the activity of inflammasome (caspase-1) in the heart by 90% (P < 0.01) and reduced infarct size, measured at pathology (by >40%, P < 0.01) and with troponin I levels (by >70%, P < 0.01). Conclusions: The small molecule 16673-34-0, an intermediate substrate in the glyburide synthesis free of the cyclohexylurea moiety, inhibits the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in cardiomyocytes and limits the infarct size after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion in the mouse, without affecting glucose metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据