4.4 Article

Naringin Ameliorates Atherogenic Dyslipidemia but not Hyperglycemia in Rats With Type 1 Diabetes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 133-141

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31823827a4

关键词

naringin; diabetes; lipids; atherosclerosis

资金

  1. Research Office of the University of KwaZulu-Natal
  2. Medical Research Council of South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antiatherogenic and hypoglycemic effects of naringin are hereby investigated in type 1 diabetes. Wistar rats (n = 6) were treated daily with 1.0 mL of water (group 1), naringin (50 mg/kg) (groups 2 and 3, respectively), regular insulin (4 U/kg, subcutaneously, twice daily) (group 4), and simvastatin (20 mg/kg) (group 6). Groups 3, 4, 5, and 6 exhibited polydipsia and hyperglycemia after injection with streptozotocin (60 mg/kg body weight). Insulin, but not naringin, significantly lowered fasting blood glucose levels in diabetic rats. Plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were significantly higher in nontreated diabetic rats (group 5) compared with control (group 1), whereas total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly higher in naringin- and simvastatin-treated diabetic rats, respectively. Hepatic total cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly elevated in nontreated diabetic compared with the control, naringin-, insulin-, and simvastatin-treated diabetic rats, respectively. Hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl CoA reductase and Acyl-CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase activities were significantly elevated in nontreated diabetic compared with the control, naringin-, and simvastatin-treated diabetic rats, respectively. However, plasma low-density lipoprotein to high-density lipoprotein ratio was significantly higher in nontreated diabetic compared with the control, whereas naringin and simvastatin significantly reduced the ratio in diabetic rats. Naringin is not hypoglycemic but improves atherogenic index in type 1 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据