4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Vascular Oxidative Stress: The Common Link in Hypertensive and Diabetic Vascular Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 308-316

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3181d89670

关键词

diabetes; hypertension; oxidants; nitric oxide; nitrotyrosine; protein oxidation

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL081587-05, P01 HL068758-06A1, R01 HL031607-26A1, P01 HL081587, R01 HL031607, P01 HL068758] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG027080, R01 AG027080-05, R01 AG27080] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular disease in hypertension and diabetes is associated with increased oxidants. The oxidants arise from NADPH oxidase, xanthine oxidase, and mitochondria. Superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide are produced by both leukocytes and vascular cells. Nitric oxide is produced in excess by inducible nitric oxide synthase, and the potent oxidant, peroxynitrite, is formed from superoxide and nitric oxide. The damage to proteins caused by oxidants is selective, affecting specific oxidant-sensitive amino acid residues. With some important vascular proteins, for example, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, prostacycline synthase, and superoxide dismutase, oxidation of a single susceptible amino acid inactivates the enzyme. The beneficial effects of antioxidants, at least in animal models of hypertension and diabetes, can in part be ascribed to protection of these and other proteins. Mutant proteins lacking their reactive constituent can recapitulate some disease phenotypes suggesting a pathogenic role of the oxidation. Thus, many of the shared functional abnormalities of hypertensive and diabetic blood vessels may be caused by oxidants. Although studies using antioxidants have failed in patients, the successful treatment of vascular disease with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, thromboxane A(2) antagonists, and polyphenols may depend on their anti-inflammatory effects and ability to decrease production of damaging oxidants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据