4.4 Article

Hemodynamic and Cardiac Neurotransmitter-releasing Effects in Conscious Dogs of Attention- and Wake-promoting Agents: A Comparison of d-Amphetamine, Atomoxetine, Modafinil, and a Novel Quinazolinone H-3 Inverse Agonist

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 52-59

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318195a470

关键词

amphetamine; modafinil; atomoxetine; histamine H-3 receptor inverse agonist

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conscious coronary sinus-cannulated dogs were used to assess the hemodynamic effects and local cardiac norepinephrine (NE) and histamine (HA) release of 4 mechanistically diverse agents either clinically approved or representing a potential novel mechanism for the promotion of wakefulness or attention. Dosing regimens were based on reported or concurrently determined wake-promoting activities in canine models. The central nervous system stimulant, d-amphetamine [0.1 mg.kg(-1).10 min(-1) intravenous (IV)], significantly elevated mean arterial pressure (+30%) and increased coronary sinus and peripheral venous NE concentrations, indicative of cardiac neurotransmitter release. The selective NE reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine (2.0 mg.kg(-1).10 min(-1) IV) and modafinil (30.0 mg.kg(-1).10 min(-1) IV) also significantly elevated mean arterial pressure (+15% and +30%, respectively), but with no effect on coronary sinus or peripheral NE concentration, Suggesting central mechanisms underlying the hemodynamic effects. The preclinical demonstrations of pressor effects with d-amphetamine, atomoxetine, and modafinil are consistent with clinically reported hemodynamic effects with these agents. The quinazolinone RA receptor subtype H-3 inverse agonist 5r (0.3 mg.kg(-1).10 min(-1) IV) displayed no effect on hemodynamics or on coronary sinus or peripheral NE and HA concentrations. These data suggest the potential for therapeutic effect with the latter mechanism in the absence of peripheral cardiac neurotransmitter release or obvious changes in cardiovascular function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据