4.3 Review

Factors Influencing the Outcomes of Patients With Both Coronary Artery Disease and Diabetes Enrolled in Standard Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs A Literature Review

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 210-217

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e31820017dc

关键词

cardiac rehabilitation; coronary artery bypass graft; functional outcomes; rehabilitation outcomes; revascularization; type 2 diabetes mellitus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently 23.5 million working-age adults 20 years or older have had a diagnosis of both coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with estimates that an additional 9% of the total US population will have a diagnosis of this chronic disease combination by the year 2025. Current annual health care costs for this working-age population including medical costs, functional disability, work loss, and premature mortality currently exceed $620 billion. Prior research efforts have shown that 25% to 32% of patients requiring a coronary revascularization procedure have both CAD and T2DM. The primary intervention prescribed for these patients to regain functional ability after revascularization is enrollment in a standard outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program. These standard programs, ranging in duration from 6 to 12 weeks, have been shown to improve the physical function of CAD patients by up to 15%, but patients diagnosed with both chronic conditions of CAD and T2DM (T2DM+CAD) attending these same programs exhibit only an 8% improvement. Moreover, T2DM+CAD patients experience much lower rates of rehabilitation program appointment adherence as well as greater program attrition (T2DM+CAD: 45%-62% vs CAD: 92%). Current medical literature regarding the relationship between CAD, T2DM, and cardiac rehabilitation will be examined to identify specific factors that could influence the functional outcomes achieved by the T2DM+CAD population when enrolled in a standard CR program and help increase understanding of why the adherence and attrition differences exist.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据