4.3 Article

An Update on the Self-care of Heart Failure Index

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 485-497

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181b4baa0

关键词

decision making; instrument; psychometric; self-management; treatment adherence

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL084394-01A1, R01 HL084394] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The Self-care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) is a measure of self-care defined as a naturalistic decision-making process involving the choice of behaviors that maintain physiological stability (maintenance) and the response to symptoms when they occur (management). In the 5 years since the SCHFI was published, we have added items, refined the response format of the maintenance scale and the SCHFI scoring procedure, and modified our advice about how to use the scores. Objective: The objective of this article was to update users on these changes. Methods: In this article, we address 8 specific questions about reliability, item difficulty, frequency of administration, learning effects, social desirability, validity, judgments of self-care adequacy, clinically relevant change, and comparability of the various versions. Results: The addition of items to the self-care maintenance scale did not significantly change the coefficient a, providing evidence that the structure of the instrument is more powerful than the individual items. No learning effect is associated with repeated administration. Social desirability is minimal. More evidence is provided of the validity of the SCHFI. A score of 70 or greater can be used as the cut-point to judge self-care adequacy, although evidence is provided that benefit occurs at even lower levels of self-care. A change in a scale score more than one-half of an SD is considered clinically relevant. Because of the standardized scores, results obtained with prior versions can be compared with those from later versions. Conclusion: The SCHFI v.6 is ready to be used by investigators. By publication in this format, we are putting the instrument in the public domain; permission is not required to use the SCHFI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据