4.3 Review

Stable angina in women: lessons from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 85-87

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283430969

关键词

angina; ischemic heart disease; women

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes [N01-HV-68161, N01-HV-68162, N01-HV-68163, N01-HV-68164, R01 HL090957-01A1, R03 AG032631-01]
  2. National Center for Research Resources [MO1-RR00425]
  3. Gustavus and Louis Pfeiffer Research Foundation, Danville, New Jersey
  4. Women's Guild of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  5. Edythe L. Broad Women's Heart Research Fellowship
  6. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  7. Barbra Streisand Women's Cardiovascular Research and Education Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paradoxical sex difference in which women have lower rates of anatomical coronary artery disease (CAD) but worsening symptoms, ischemia, and outcomes appears to be linked to a sex-specific pathophysiology of coronary reactivity, which includes microvascular dysfunction. For women with obstructive CAD, their risk is elevated compared with men, yet women are less likely to receive guideline-indicated therapies. For women with evidence of ischemia but no obstructive CAD, antianginal and antiischemic therapies can ameliorate symptoms, improve endothelial function and quality of life; however, trials aimed to improve outcomes are needed. Thus, ischemic heart disease (IHD) in women presents a unique and difficult challenge for clinicians due to a greater symptom burden, functional disability, higher healthcare costs, and more adverse outcomes as compared with men, despite a lower prevalence and severity of obstructive CAD, which remains the current focus of therapeutic strategies. Continued research is indicated to devise therapeutic regimens to improve symptom burden and reduce risk in women with IHD. J Cardiovasc Med 12:85-87 (C) 2011 Italian Federation of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据