4.2 Article

Electrocardiographic Characteristics in Patients With Pulmonary Sarcoidosis Indicating Cardiac Involvement

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 1243-1248

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02099.x

关键词

bundle branch block; cardiac sarcoid; cardiomyopathy; electrocardiography; sarcoidosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ECG Characteristics of Cardiac Sarcoidosis. Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease that can affect the heart. Early identification of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is critical because sudden death can be the initial presentation. We sought to evaluate the potential role of the ECG for identification of cardiac involvement in a cohort of patients with biopsy-proven pulmonary sarcoidosis. Methods: Our cohort consisted of referred patients with biopsy-proven pulmonary sarcoidosis who demonstrated symptoms consistent with cardiac involvement. The ECG characteristics collected were PR, QRS duration, QT interval, rate, bundle branch block (BBB), fragmented QRS (fQRS). QRS fragmentation was defined as 2 anatomically contiguous leads demonstrating RSR' patterns in the absence of BBB. Results: There were 112 subjects included in the cohort. Of the 52 subjects eventually diagnosed with CS, 39 had an ECG demonstrating fQRS while 21 of the 60 of non-CS patients had fQRS (75% vs 33.9%, P < 0.01). A RBBB or LBBB pattern were both more prevalent in the CS population (RBBB: 23.1% vs 6.7%, P = 0.016; LBBB: 3.8% vs 1.7%, P = 0.6). QRS duration remained significantly associated with CS after exclusion of those with BBB (93.5 +/- 10.6 vs 88 +/- 11 ms; P = 0.04). When fQRS and bundle branch block were combined, 90.4% of CS patient's ECGs contained at least one of the features, compared to 36.7% of noncardiac CS (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The presence of fQRS or BBB pattern in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis is associated with cardiac involvement and therefore should prompt further evaluation. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 1243-1248, November 2011)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据