期刊
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 1321-1329出版社
W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.03.026
关键词
thoracic anesthesia; airway management; one-lung ventilation; fluid management; postoperative pain relief; double-lumen tube; bronchial blockers
Objective: The object of this study was to conduct and analyze the output of a survey involving a cohort of all Italian hospitals performing thoracic surgery to gather data on anesthetic management, one-lung ventilation (OLV) management, and post-thoracotomy pain relief in thoracic anesthesia. Design: Survey. Setting: Italy. Participants: An invitation to participate in the survey was e-mailed to all the members of the Italian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 62 responses were received from 47 centers. The key findings were: Double-lumen tube is still the first choice lung separation technique in current use; pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation modes are homogenously distributed across the sample and, a tidal volumes (V-T) of 4-6 mL/kg during OLV was preferred to all others; moderate or restrictive fluid management were the most used strategies of fluid administration in thoracic anesthesia; thoracic epidural analgesia represented the gold standard for post-thoracotomy pain relief in combination with intravenous analgesia. Conclusion: The results of this survey showed that Italian anesthesiologist follow the recommended standard of care for anesthetic management during OLV. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据