4.3 Article

Heart failure with preserved versus reduced left ventricular systolic function: A prospective cohort of Shinken Database 2004-2005

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 55, 期 1, 页码 108-116

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2009.10.009

关键词

Heart failure; Prognosis; Epidemiologic methods; Ventricular function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Several hospital-based investigations have reported that a high proportion of patients with heart failure (HF) have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, prognosis, and predictors for mortality of Japanese HF patients with preserved versus reduced LVEF in a prospective cohort fashion. Methods and results: Our hospital-based database including inpatients and also outpatients was used for analysis. Out of 4255 new patients, 597 patients (male/female 414/183, age 65.1 +/- 12.9 years) were diagnosed as having symptomatic HF at the initial visit. Among 589 HF patients undergoing echocardiography, 398 (67.6%) showed a preserved LVEF (>50%) and 191 (32.4%) had a reduced LVEF (<= 50%). Patients with preserved LVEF were older (p = 0.004) and more likely to be female (p = 0.002). During follow-up of an average 539 days, 34 cardiovascular deaths occurred, and patients with preserved LVEF showed a better prognosis than those with reduced LVEF (3.2% vs. 7.4% per year, p = 0.0097). Multivariate Cox hazards analysis identified LVEF as an independent predictor in all HF patients. Also, separated group analysis showed that presence of chronic kidney disease was independently associated with poor prognosis irrespective of HF types. Conclusions: This prospective cohort study identified prevalence and prognosis of HF in Japanese in- and outpatients, where patients with preserved LVEF showed a better prognosis than those with reduced LVEF. (C) 2009 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据