4.5 Article

The Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Patients Hospitalized for Worsening Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of the EVEREST Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 515-523

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.04.010

关键词

COPD; heart failure; hospitalization; outcomes

资金

  1. Otsuka Inc. (Rockville, Maryland)
  2. Otsuka
  3. Johnson Johnson
  4. Amgen
  5. Trevena
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. Servier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is prevalent in heart failure (HF) patients, yet these patients are poorly characterized. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with systolic dysfunction and COPD in a contemporary HF randomized trial. Methods and Results: EVEREST investigated 4,133 patients hospitalized with worsening HF and an ejection fraction (EF) <= 40%. We analyzed the characteristics and outcomes (all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality/HF hospitalization) of patients according to baseline COPD status. COPD was present in 10% (n = 416) of patients. Patients with COPD had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and were less likely to receive a beta-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, or aldosterone antagonist. On univariate analysis, COPD was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.18-1.67) and cardiovascular mortality/HF hospitalization (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.11-1.49). After adjusting for potential confounders, the risk associated with COPD remained increased, but was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The presence of COPD in HF patients is associated with an increased burden of comorbidities, lower use of HF therapies, and a trend toward worse outcomes. These findings provide a starting point for prospective investigations of the treatment of HF comorbidities to reduce the high postdischarge event rates. CI Cardiac Fail 2012;18:515-523)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据