4.5 Article

Tricuspid Regurgitation Contributes to Renal Dysfunction in Patients With Heart Failure

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 824-830

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.07.236

关键词

Central venous pressure; venous congestion; glomerular filtration rate; urea nitrogen

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PBZHB-121007]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In heart failure (HF), renal dysfunction is associated with an adverse prognosis. Impaired renal perfusion from left ventricular dysfunction is thought to be a principal underlying mechanism. Less is known about the influence of venous congestion, including the potential contribution of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Methods and Results: Echocardiograms and a simultaneous (+/- 1 day) blood sample from 196 HF patients were analyzed. Patients with at least moderate TR (n = 78) had larger right-sided cardiac cavities. higher right ventricular systolic pressure, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), higher serum urea nitrogen (SUN), and SUN/creatinine ratio than patients with less than moderate TR (n = 118). In multivariate linear regression analysis, TR severity (P = .003), older age (P < .001). and loop diuretic use (P = .008) were independently associated with lower eGFR. and use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system was associated with higher eGFR (P = .001). TR severity (P < .001) and older age (P < .001) were independently associated with higher SUN. TR severity (P = .004) and smaller left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P = .048) were independent predictors of a higher SUN/creatinine ratio (P = .004). Conclusions: Although a causal relationship cannot be proven, we suggest that significant TR contributes to renal dysfunction in HF patients, probably by elevation of central and renal venous pressure. (J Cardiac Fail 2008:14:824-830)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据